
I first noticed this story on Derren Brown's blog a week and a half ago. Assuming it was just a few wacky security guys in an isolated incident, I only skimmed the story and thought, "oh that's an odd one," and then I wrote it off as a silly thing to be forgotten unless it comes up in the most random conversation down the road. However, over the past few days I keep seeing variations of the story coming up again and again. You see, when I first saw this piece, what I didn't know was (1) the "magic bomb detecting wands" cost several thousands of US dollars a piece and (2) the Iraqis bought something in the neighborhood of $85,000,000 worth of them from a British company called ATSC.
That's right... They spent about 85 million on magic wands. Let that soak in for a minute. :(
How can any sane person not just find this confusing? I don't understand why using any unproven "magic" bomb detecting device was ever even open to discussion in Iraq, let alone regarded as a potentially good idea. I don't care how scientifically illiterate or otherwise f@#ked up your culture is... If any device is not conclusively and observably proven as repeatedly reliable, you just don't spend tens of millions of dollars on it or make it part of any procedure to protect people's lives... End of freaking story!
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/14/bad-science-iraq-ben-goldacre
* http://correspondents.theatlantic.com/graeme_wood/2009/11/superstition_at_the_checkpoints.php
* http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=3
.



